I still haven’t worked out who I want to be or what I want to do when I grow up, so on this blog please join me while I try and work it out while keeping child-like creativity alive!  Find home and fashion inspiration; travel and days out; photography, writing and more. Have fun looking around 🙂

 

00

Strictly Dance Fever

Presented by Graham Norton on BBC1 on Saturday evenings. (And comments on the BBC3 follow-up) We’re nearing the finals now. And I’m going to see them dancing live on Wednesday!!

I didn’t watch this program last year, but I wish I had because I’m really enjoying it. I hadn’t realised before that they have to learn completely different dance styles each week, so it does actually keep your interest the whole time and means it probably appeals to a bigger audience. They should probably do the same on Strictly Come Dancing as well because the celebrities just aren’t interesting enough for me to watch Latin and Ballroom the whole time.

The format of the show is virtually a complete copy, but with the audition process of ordinary people, making it more like the X Factor or something. There’s a panel of 4 judges: Arlene Phillips, Wayne Sleep, Stacey Haynes and Ben Richards, and they rip apart the dances performed by each couple each week and give their scores. The public vote as well and each week one couple is eliminated from the show.

I’m not sure how well this works with dancing. I can understand why the public vote is important in shows like the X Factor because it’s the public who will be buying the records of the winner so they have to like him or her. But (and I’m going to be very judgemental and typify here) the people who can afford to go to west end musicals (the winner gets a contract at one) are probably out there doing just that on a Saturday evening and the people like me who are at home watching the telly are probably never going to see the winners ever again. So what it should come down to entirely is the talent of the dancers and not how popular they are. But on the other hand I can understand why a program entirely about dancing, a subject that’s not going to bring in the ratings by itself, needs viewer participation.

My big complaint is the absolutely terrible program that is Strictly Dance Fever on Three. It comes on BBC3 straight after the BBC1 program and honestly I’ve never watched a more crap follow-up thing on a sky channel. It’s presented by June Sarpong, which doesn’t help because she is just soooo annoying! I can’t stand it every time she speaks. However I think she’s very very pretty and should keep her mouth closed and model instead.

I’m getting off the point. The program is so badly prepared. They have some west end guy on giving his opinion which is never anything original because we’ve heard all there is to say from the judges already. We have to sit through yet more clips from the dances they’ve just done. It was only 5 minutes ago – our memories aren’t that flipping bad!! This week loads of the program was filled up with some not-really-famous comedian learning to dance. Then they had three celebrities on who seemed like they actually had something interesting to say and June had to cut each of them off mid sentences because she ran out of time.

The only thing good about this program is the interview with Graham each week as it reminds you that he’s actually quite funny and a nice guy when what he’s saying isn’t scripted. But come on BBC3 Think about your audience!!! Either they are going to be fiends for reality TV or they are going to be very interested in dancing. Concentrate on the first and you’ve got hours and hours of footage of the dancers in the mansion. Or concentrate on the second and you’ve got an opportunity to give more information about the dancing and show more of their dance lessons. I know for a fact that proffessional dancers were brought in and filmed demonstrating a dance (my dance teacher was one of them) so they could show that! It’s obvious! We don’t want to see repeats of the program we’ve only seen minutes before! Sort it out for next year please!

Entertainment, TV,
00no comment

Other posts you may like:

3 days in Oxford – Day 1. The story of the photographs
September 16, 2016
I was so excited about this little mini-break to Oxford. I love my family to bits, but sometimes it’s nice to be alone and have a little headspace all to yourself! I also find it difficult to relax at home because there’s always so much to do there. I don’t think it helps that I work from home either, so no matter if it’s the evening or weekend, I still always feel I should either be working or doing something towards fixing the house. I was also a little bit nervous because I’m not great at driving and get flustered easily, but the journey was good; I didn’t get lost once and made it to the park and ride with no problems following the sat nav!….
Negotiating lipstick with piercings and a wonky mouth!
March 3, 2017
I have never really worn lipstick. In my mind, it just hasn’t suited me – I have a very thin top lip and and a very fat bottom lip and overall my mouth is very lop-sided. I could happily go on being self-critical, but I won’t! I also think part of the problem is I was trying the wrong colours – brown was very much the fashion in the ’90s when I was playing around with make-up, and although I never really thought lipstick fashions were a thing, I have noticed that brown lipsticks are back….
Afternoon tea in Bath
Afternoon Tea with Mr Darcy at the Jane Austen Centre in Bath, Somerset
September 21, 2018
We asked what Jude would like to do for her Twentieth birthday (yes, you did hear me correctly: twentieth birthday) and she asked to go out for afternoon tea. I’ll be honest, when I agreed, I was thinking more like at a National Trust cafe, but Jude had in mind the full afternoon tea experience. Apart from on a cruise, I’ve never done this, (it’s the sort of thing I’ll do when I grow up) so was looking forward to experiencing the proper deal….

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.